中国生态旅游 ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (5): 798-810.doi: 10.12342/zgstly.20210057

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

国家公园生态银行模式构建——以神农架国家公园试点为例

刘军1,2(), 刘霁玮1, 岳梦婷3   

  1. 1.湖北大学旅游学院,武汉 430062
    2.湖北大学旅游发展研究院,武汉 430062
    3.华东师范大学城市与区域科学学院,上海 200241
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-18 修回日期:2021-09-09 出版日期:2021-10-28 发布日期:2022-05-30
  • 作者简介:刘军(1990-),男,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为生态旅游。E-mail: magicliu@hubu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学青年基金项目(17CJY051);湖北省教育厅科研计划项目

National park ecological bank model construction: A case of Shennongjia National Park Pilot

LIU Jun1,2(), LIU Jiwei1, YUE Mengting3   

  1. 1. School of Tourism, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
    2. Tourism Development Institute of Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
    3. School of Urban and Regional Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
  • Received:2021-06-18 Revised:2021-09-09 Published:2021-10-28 Online:2022-05-30

摘要:

自然保护地生态资源向生态资本转化过程中,生态信用买卖双方主体确认、交易步骤、额度分配等一直是实践难题。本文在借鉴国外生态银行机制模式与运行经验的基础上,尝试从组织结构、信用标准、交易方式3个方面,构建基于生态资源评估的发起者、开发者与第三方监管参与的生态银行运作模式。以神农架国家公园试点为实证案例,参考已有生态系统服务价值当量表、不同土地利用类型的当量因子修正等研究成果,对2005、2010、2015及2018年的生态系统服务价值评估发现,河渠、滩涂、林地的生态信用最高,水田、旱地、建设用地生态信用最低,以此提出神农架国家公园试点的生态信用下限,以期为神农架国家公园试点和其他自然保护地构建生态银行机制和确定生态信用标准提供参考。

关键词: 生态银行, 生态信用, 生态系统服务价值, 国家公园, 神农架

Abstract:

In the process of transforming the natural resources of nature reserves into natural capital, the confirmation of the main body of the buyers and sellers of ecological credit, transaction procedures, and quota allocation have always been practical problems. Based on the mechanism model and operating experience of foreign eco-bank, this article attempts to construct an eco-bank operation model based on the evaluation of eco-resources from the three aspects of organizational structure, credit standards, and transaction methods. Taking the Shennongjia National Park pilot project as an empirical case, referring to the existing research results of the ecosystem service value equivalent table and the equivalent factor correction of different land use types, the evaluation of the ecosystem service value of the Shennongjia National Park in 2005, 2010, 2015 and 2018 found The ecological credit of river channels, tidal flats, and forest land is the highest, and the ecological credit of paddy fields, dry land, and construction land is the lowest. This proposed the lower limit of ecological credit for Shennongjia National Park, with a view to building an ecological bank mechanism and ecological credit standards for Shennongjia National Park and other nature reserves Provide reference for the determination.

Key words: National Parks, Eco Bank, Eco Credit, Ecosystem Service Value