中国生态旅游 ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (6): 1053-1066.doi: 10.12342/zgstly.20220080

• 行政区划与旅游发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

跨界景区的空间分布、类型划分及治理模式

朱建华1,2(), 龚悦1, 董洁1, 李文雅1   

  1. 1.东北师范大学地理科学学院,长春 130024
    2.东北师范大学长白山地理过程与生态安全教育部重点实验室,长春 130024
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-27 修回日期:2022-10-16 出版日期:2022-12-28 发布日期:2023-01-16
  • 作者简介:朱建华(1988-),男,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为旅游地理与行政区划。E-mail: zjh198827@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41701150)

Spatial distribution, classification and governance mode of cross-boundary scenic spots

Zhu Jianhua1,2(), Gong Yue1, Dong Jie1, Li Wenya1   

  1. 1. School of Geographical Sciences, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
    2. Key Laboratory of Geographical Processes and Ecological Security of Changbai Mountains, Ministry of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
  • Received:2022-05-27 Revised:2022-10-16 Published:2022-12-28 Online:2023-01-16

摘要:

跨界景区作为相邻政区间的交错区域,其内部一体化的旅游资源因客观存在的行政边界而被相对割裂,成为区域空间治理的特殊类型。研究以全国306个5A级旅游景区为研究对象,利用地图数据和GIS空间分析研究得出:(1)中国现有69个跨界5A级旅游景区,整体呈现集聚型空间分布格局;(2)跨界景区可从开发目的、主体资源类型、边界尺度和跨界单元角度进行划分,不同类型跨界景区的旅游开发与管理存在明显差异;(3)跨界景区现有一方政府主导、多区治理、管委会治理和企业主导4类管理模式,不同管理模式既有阶段性特征也存在共有问题。最后基于不同空间尺度,提出行政区划调整、政区横向联系和企业统一经营3种具体整合路径,以期突破边界屏蔽效应,实现有效的区域旅游合作治理。

关键词: 跨界景区, 空间分布, 类型划分, 治理模式, 行政边界

Abstract:

As an interlocking area between adjacent administrative regions, the integrated natural geographical units within scenic spots are relatively fragmented due to the existence of administrative boundaries, making them a special type of regional spatial governance. This paper takes 306 5A-level scenic spots in China as the research objects, uses map data and GIS spatial analysis to draw the following conclusions: (1) There are 69 5A-level cross-boundary scenic spots in China, with an overall clustered spatial distribution pattern. (2) Cross-boundary scenic spots can be divided from the perspective of development purpose, type of primary resource, boundary scale and cross-boundary unit. Tourism development and management of different types of cross-boundary scenic spots are distinct. (3) There are four different manage-ment modes for cross-boundary scenic spots: government-led, multi-zone governance, manage-ment committee governance and enterprise-led. Each management mode has both periodical characteristics and common problems. Finally, based on different spatial scales, this paper puts forward three specific integration paths: boundary modification of adjacent administration regions; horizontal connection between government departments; unified management mode by tourism enterprises. This study aims to break through the boundary shielding effect and achieve effective regional tourism cooperative governance.

Key words: cross-boundary scenic spots, spatial distribution, classification, governance modes, administrative boundaries, tourist scenic spots