大运河国家文化公园项目空间分布特征及其影响因素

doi:10.12342/zgstly.20230021

Abstract

Abstract:

Major projects are the key to building and utilizing National Cultural Park well, and also the core carrier of building important symbols of Chinese culture. This paper focuses on the perspective of major projects that are less concerned in the current study of National Cultural Park, analyzes their spatial distribution characteristics by using mathematical statistics and GIS spatial analysis methods, and examines the influencing factors of spatial distribution in combination with Geodetector. The results show that: (1) Major projects of the Grand Canal National Cultural Park show the characteristics of point-axis distribution, with over 80% within the 10 kilometer buffer zone of the canal. (2) The spatial distribution of the project shows the characteristics of “core agglomeration, connected into areas, and belt-shaped distribution”, including the high-density concentration area in Tianjin, the sub-density core area at the southwest border of Anhui and Jiangsu provinces, and three banded distribution areas, namely Hebei District, Tianjin—Rencheng District, Jining City, Shandong Province, Nanle County, Puyang City, Henan Province—Chanhe Hui District, Luoyang City, Henan Province—Yongqiao District, Suzhou City, Anhui Province—Xiuzhou District, Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province. (3) The spatial distribution of the projects is affected by multiple factors, and the explanatory power is ranked as follows: the proximity of canal cultural heritage > the proportion of tertiary industry > the proximity of canal water system > policy support > the proximity of traffic roads > the level of fiscal revenue > resident population scale. The interactive influence of different influencing factors is greater than that of single influencing factor, and the interaction between the proximity of canal cultural heritage and the proportion of tertiary industry is the strongest. This paper studies major projects from a spatial perspective, exploring the overall spatial layout of National Cultural Park projects and the spatial factors involved in project selection. It deepens the current research on the project system of giant linear cultural heritage management, which is of great significance for optimizing the overall layout of national cultural park projects and promoting coordinated development.

Key words: National Cultural Park, The Grand Canal, project system, spatial distribution

Wu Miaomiao, Dai Juncheng, Xie Fan. Spatial distribution characteristics of the Grand Canal National Cultural Park project and its influencing factors[J].ECOTOURISM, 2023, 13(3): 420-437.

Figures/Tables 14

Fig. 1

Tab. 1

Tab. 2

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Tab. 3

Fig. 5

Tab. 4

Tab. 5

Tab. 6

Tab. 7

Tab. 8

Tab. 9

References 49

[1]	新华社. 中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会报告[EB/OL]. (2022-10-25). https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/25/content_5721685.htm.
	[ Xinhua News Agency. Report on the 20th National Congress of the CPC[EB/OL]. (2022-10-25). https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-10/25/content_5721685.htm.]
[2]	文旅中国. 满足人民美好生活需要推动文化事业高质量发展[EB/OL]. (2022-02-16). https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1746819173793526011&wfr=spider&for=pc.
	[ Cultural Tourism in China. Meet people’s needs for a better life and promote high-quality development of cultural undertakings[EB/OL]. (2022-02-16). https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1746819173793526011&wfr=spider&for=pc.]
[3]	祁述裕. 国家文化公园建设的现状、问题和展望[EB/OL]. (2022-06-20). https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1736169529896772042&wfr=spider&for=pc.
	[ Qi Shuyu. The current situation, problems and prospects of National Cultural Park Construction[EB/OL]. (2022-06-20). https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1736169529896772042&wfr=spider&for=pc.]
[4]	刘庆柱, 汤羽扬, 张朝枝, 等. 笔谈: 国家文化公园的概念定位、价值挖掘、传承展示及实现途径[J]. 中国文化遗产, 2021(5): 15-27.
	[ Liu Qingzhu, Tang Yuyang, Zhang Chaozhi, et al. Written talk: Concept orientation, value discovery, inheritance display and realization ways of National Cultural Park[J]. Chinese Cultural Heritage, 2021(5): 15-27.]
[5]	孙华. 国家文化公园初论: 概念、类型、特征与建设[J]. 中国文化遗产, 2021(5): 4-14.
	[ Sun Hua. On National Cultural Park: Concept, types, characteristics and construction[J]. China Cultural Heritage, 2021(5): 4-14.]
[6]	风景园林.LA观点: 国家文化公园.[EB/OL]. (2023-03-15). https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/sKmnECSdrRQAM2wW2L4JaQ.
	[ Landscape Architecture. LA Viewpoint: National cultural park[EB/OL] (2023-03-15). https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/sKmnECSdrRQAM2wW2L4JaQ.]
[7]	张良. “项目治国”的成效与限度: 以国家公共文化服务体系示范区(项目)为分析对象[J]. 人文杂志, 2013(1): 114-121.
	[ Zhang Liang. The effectiveness and limitation of “project governance”: Taking the National Public Cultural Service System Demonstration Zone (Project) as the analysis object[J]. Journal of Humanities, 2013(1): 114-121.]
[8]	渠敬东. 项目制: 一种新的国家治理体制[J]. 中国社会科学, 2012(5): 113-130, 207.
	[ Qu Jingdong. Project system: A new system of state governance[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2012(5): 113-130, 207.]
[9]	李博. 项目制扶贫的运作逻辑与地方性实践: 以精准扶贫视角看A县竞争性扶贫项目[J]. 北京社会科学, 2016(3): 106-112.
	[ Li Bo. On the logic and practice of the project system of poverty alleviation: A case study of competitive poverty alleviation project in a county[J]. Social Sciences of Beijing, 2016(3): 106-112.]
[10]	李祖佩. 项目制的基层解构及其研究拓展: 基于某县涉农项目运作的实证分析[J]. 开放时代, 2015(2): 123-142, 6.
	[ Li Zupei. Grassroots deconstruction of the project system and extended study: An empirical analysis based on the agriculture-related projects in a county[J]. Open Times, 2015(2): 123-142, 6.]
[11]	吴正泓, 陈通, 侯光辉. 公共文化服务“项目制”合作治理主体决策及逻辑冲突[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(1): 322-329.
	[ Wu Zhenghong, Chen Tong, Hou Guanghui. Decision making of collaborative governance subjects and logical conflict of public cultural service projects[J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(1): 322-329.]
[12]	折晓叶, 陈婴婴. 项目制的分级运作机制和治理逻辑: 对“项目进村”案例的社会学分析[J]. 中国社会科学, 2011(4): 126-148, 223.
	[ Zhe Xiaoye, Chen Yingying. The mechanism and governance logic of the hierarchical operation of the project system: A sociological case study of “projects entering the village”[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2011(4): 126-148, 223.]
[13]	郑世林. 中国政府经济治理的项目体制研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2016(2): 23-38.
	[ Zheng Shilin. The model of Chinese economic governance: Project institutions[J]. China Soft Science, 2016(2): 23-38.]
[14]	关晓铭. 项目制: 国家治理现代化的技术选择: 技术政治学的视角[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报, 2020(5): 87-102, 127.
	[ Guan Xiaoming. The project system: The technical choice of the modernization of national governance: From the perspective of technological politics[J]. Journal of Gansu Administration Institute, 2020(5): 87-102, 127.]
[15]	周雪光, 练宏. 中国政府的治理模式: 一个“控制权”理论[J]. 社会学研究, 2012, 27(5): 69-93, 243.
	[ Zhou Xueguang, Lian Hong. Modes of governance in the Chinese Bureaucracy: A “control rights” theory[J]. Sociological Studies, 2012, 27(5): 69-93, 243.]
[16]	时帅. 项目制扶贫“碎片化”的多维整合机制研究[J]. 改革与开放, 2018(14): 108-109, 112.
	[ Shi Shuai. Research on multi-dimensional integration mechanism of project-based poverty alleviation “fragmentation”[J]. Reform & Openning, 2018(14): 108-109, 112.]
[17]	郑竹沁. 时间空间维度下的 “项目进村”: 以W市S村为研究对象[J]. 新农村(黑龙江), 2017(26): 11-12.
	[ Zheng Zhuqin. “Project entering the village” in the dimension of time and space: A case study of S village in W city[J]. New Countryside, 2017(26): 11-12.]
[18]	龚倡, 姜卫兵, 宋居宇, 等. 江苏特色田园乡村项目空间布局特征及影响因素分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(8): 1-7.
	[ Gong Chang, Jiang Weibing, Song Juyu, et al. Analysis of spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of characteristic pastoral countryside projects in Jiangsu Province[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(8): 1-7.]
[19]	郑璐. 黄河流域九省区体育旅游精品项目发展现状与优化策略研究[D]. 开封: 河南大学, 2022.
	[ Zheng Lu. Research on the development status and optimization strategies of sports tourism boutique projects in nine provinces of the Yellow River Basin[D]. Kaifeng: Henan University, 2022.]
[20]	马爱华, 岳大鹏, 胡倩, 等. 全国旅游扶贫示范项目空间分布特征及影响因素分析[J]. 江西农业学报, 2019, 31(3): 144-150.
	[ Ma Aihua, Yue Dapeng, Hu Qian, et al. Analysis of spatial distribution characteristics and impact factors of national pro-poor tourism demonstration projects[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2019, 31(3): 144-150.]
[21]	马丽, 龚忠杰, 陈琳琳. 工业遗产旅游资源布局与开发的工业地理学基础与启示[J]. 中国生态旅游, 2023, 13(2): 268-278. doi: 10.12342/zgstly.20220020
	[ Ma Li, Gong Zhongjie, Chen Linlin. The application and prospect of industrial geography in the industrial heritage tourism practices and researches[J]. Journal of Chinese Ecotourism, 2023, 13(2): 268-278.] doi: 10.12342/zgstly.20220020
[22]	刘昭祎, 李鹏. 长城国家文化公园(北京段)建设保护实施中的项目体系研究[EB/OL]. (2022-04-01). https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/zJDOT0fBKK__YdUfYms3JQ.
	[ Liu Zhaoyi, Li Peng. The project system research in the construction protection implementation protection implementation of the Great Wall National Cultural Park (Beijing Section)[EB/OL]. (2022-04-01). https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/zJDOT0fBKK__YdUfYms3JQ.]
[23]	中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 坚持保护优先增强文化自信高质量推进大运河文化保护传承利用: 国家文化公园建设工作领导小组办公室负责人就《大运河国家文化公园建设保护规划》答记者问[EB/OL]. (2021-10-27). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-10/27/content_5647092.htm.
	[ The Central People's Government of the China. Adhering to the principle of givingpriority to protection, enhancing cultural confidence, and promoting the inheritance and utilization of the Grand Canal culture with high quality. The head of the Office of the Leading Group for the Construction of National Cultural Park answered questions from reporters on the Construction and Protection Plan of the Grand Canal National Cultural Park[EB/OL]. (2021-10-27). https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-10/27/Content_5647092.htm.]
[24]	王莉莉. 中国大运河的历史变迁、遗产构成与当代价值[J]. 黄河·黄土·黄种人, 2020(21): 3-4.
	[ Wang Lili. Historical changes, heritage composition and contemporary value of the Grand Canal in China[J]. Yellow River Yellow Earth Yellow Race, 2020(21): 3-4.]
[25]	向云驹. 论大运河国家文化公园的非物质文化遗产层级及其呈现[J]. 中原文化研究, 2022, 10(2): 84-92.
	[ Xiang Yunju. On the level and presentation of intangible cultural heritage in Grand Canal National Cultural Park[J]. The Central Plains Culture Research, 2022, 10(2): 84-92.]
[26]	长城、大运河、长征国家文化公园建设保护规划出台[J]. 现代城市研究, 2021(9): 131.
	[The Construction and Protection Plan for the Great Wall, Grand Canal, and Long March National Cultural Park was issued[J]. Modern City Research, 2021(9): 131.]
[27]	新华社. 探索新时代文物和文化资源保护传承利用新路: 中央有关部门负责人就《长城、大运河、长征国家文化公园建设方案》答记者问[EB/OL]. (2019-12-05). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-12/05/content_5458886.htm.
	[ Xinhua News Agency. Exploring a new way to protect, inherit and utilize cultural relics and Cultural resource management in the new era: Heads of relevant central departments answered questions about the Construction Plan of the Great Wall, the Grand Canal and the Long March National Cultural Park[EB/OL]. (2019-12-05). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-12/05/content_5458886.htm.]
[28]	中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会. 关于印发《文化保护传承利用工程实施方案》的通知[EB/OL]. (2021-04-25). https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/202104/t20210428_1277842_ext.html.
	[ National Development and Reform Commission. Notice on the Issuance of the Implementation Plan of Cultural Conservation, Inheritance and Utilization Project[EB/OL]. (2021-04-25). https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/202104/t20210428_1277842_ext.html.]
[29]	Clark P J, Evans F C. Distance to nearest neighbour as a measure of spatial relationship in population[J]. Ecology, 1954, 35: 445-453. doi: 10.2307/1931034
[30]	Pinder D A, Witherick M E. Nearest‐neighbour analysis of linear point patterns[J]. Tijdschrift voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 1973, 64(3): 160-163. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.1973.tb00077.x
[31]	郑群明, 田甜, 杨小亚. 中国国家森林乡村的空间分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 中国生态旅游, 2021, 11(3): 441-454. doi: 10.12342/zgstly.20210053
	[ Zheng Qunming, Tian Tian, Yang Xiaoya. The spatial distribution and influencing factors of the national forest villages in China[J]. Journal of Chinese Ecotourism, 2021, 11(3): 441-454.] doi: 10.12342/zgstly.20210053
[32]	冯亚芬, 俞万源, 雷汝林. 广东省传统村落空间分布特征及影响因素研究[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(2): 236-243. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.02.009
	[ Feng Yafen, Yu Wanyuan, Lei Rulin. Spatial distribution features and controlling factors of traditional villages in Guangdong Province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(2): 236-243.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.02.009
[33]	黄聪, 赵小敏, 郭熙, 等. 基于核密度的余江县农村居民点布局优化研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2016, 21(11): 165-174.
	[ Huang Cong, Zhao Xiaomin, Guo Xi, et al. Study on the rural residential layout optimization of Yujiang county based on kernel density[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2016, 21(11): 165-174.]
[34]	魏珍, 张凤太, 张译, 等. 贵州少数民族特色村寨时空分布特征与影响因素分析[J]. 贵州民族研究, 2021, 42(1): 113-121.
	[ Wei Zhen, Zhang Fengtai, Zhang Yi, et al. Analysis of time and space distribution characteristics and influencing factors of the minority ethnic village in Guizhou Province[J]. Guizhou Ethnic Studies, 2021, 42(1): 113-121.]
[35]	商馨莹. 基于标准差椭圆法分析农村居民点分布特征: 以淮南市潘集区为例[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2018, 29(9): 244-246.
	[ Shang Xinying. Analysis of distribution characteristics of rural residential areas based on standard deviation ellipse method: A case study of Panji District, Huainan City[J]. Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 2018, 29(9): 244-246.]
[36]	冯子钰, 施润和. 中国近地面PM 2.5浓度与排放的时空分布及其关联分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(7): 1221-1230. doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2021.200367
	[ Feng Ziyu, Shi Runhe. Spatio-temporal features and the association of ground-level PM2.5 concentration and its emission in China[J]. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2021, 23(7): 1221-1230.]
[37]	王劲峰, 徐成东. 地理探测器: 原理与展望[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 116-134. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010
	[ Wang Jinfeng, Xu Chengdong. Geodetector: Principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1): 116-134.] doi: 10.11821/dlxb201701010
[38]	沈士琨, 史春云, 张大园, 等. 江苏省乡村旅游地空间分布及其影响因素研究[J]. 中国生态旅游, 2021, 11(3): 455-467. doi: 10.12342/zgstly.20210047
	[ Shen Shikun, Shi Chunyun, Zhang Dayuan, et al. Research on the spatial distribution of rural tourist attractions in Jiangsu Province and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Chinese Ecotourism, 2021, 11(3): 455-467.] doi: 10.12342/zgstly.20210047
[39]	高彩霞, 刘家明, 李凤娇, 等. 国家级旅游度假区的空间分异及影响因素[J]. 中国生态旅游, 2022, 12(3): 386-398. doi: 10.12342/zgstly.20220021
	[ Gao Caixia, Liu Jiaming, Li Fengjiao, et al. The spatial distribution of China’s national tourism resorts and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Chinese Ecotourism, 2022, 12(3): 386-398.] doi: 10.12342/zgstly.20220021
[40]	秦宗财. 大运河国家文化公园系统性建设的五个维度[J]. 南京社会科学, 2022(3): 162-170.
	[ Qin Zongcai. Five dimensions of the Grand Canal National Cultural Park systematic construction[J]. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, 2022(3): 162-170.]
[41]	朱磊, 李燕楠, 胡静, 等. 国家森林公园空间分布格局及其影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(2): 389-400.
	[ Zhu Lei, Li Yannan, Hu Jing, et al. Spatial differentiation pattern and influencing factors of China National Forest Park[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2022, 45(2): 389-400.]
[42]	陈刚, 吴清, 杨俭波, 等. 中国国家森林乡村的空间分布特征与影响因素[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(6): 196-204.
	[ Chen Gang, Wu Qing, Yang Jianbo, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of China national forest villages[J]. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(6): 196-204.]
[43]	程乾, 凌素培. 中国非物质文化遗产的空间分布特征及影响因素分析[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(10): 1166-1172. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2013.010.1166
	[ Cheng Qian, Ling Supei. Geographical distribution and affecting factors of the intangible cultural heritage in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33(10): 1166-1172.] doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2013.010.1166
[44]	李伯华, 尹莎, 刘沛林, 等. 湖南省传统村落空间分布特征及影响因素分析[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(2): 189-194.
	[ Li Bohua, Yin Sha, Liu Peilin, et al. Spatial distribution of traditional villages and the influencing factors in Hunan Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(2): 189-194.] doi: 10.2307/142061
[45]	贺炳旭, 孙会谦. 国家文化公园投融资体系建设构想[J]. 北方经贸, 2022(7): 136-139.
	[ He Bingxu, Sun Huiqian. Conception of investment and financing system construction of National Cultural Park[J]. Northern Economy and Trade, 2022(7): 136-139.]
[46]	孙佳俐, 史英霞. 大运河国家文化公园背景下的聚落更新: 以京杭大运河通州段为例[J]. 中国艺术, 2021(5): 32-41.
	[ Sun Jiali, Shi Yingxia. Settlement renewal in the context of the Grand Canal National Cultural Park: A case study of Tongzhou section of the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal[J]. Chinese Art, 2021(5): 32-41.]
[47]	陈喜波, 王亚男, 郗志群. 北京大运河国家文化公园建设的生态路径研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2022, 29(8): 38-43.
	[ Chen Xibo, Wang Yanan, Xi Zhiqun. Study on the ecological path of the construction of Beijing Grand Canal National Cultural Park[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2022, 29(8): 38-43.]
[48]	程惠哲. 从公共文化空间到国家文化公园公共文化空间既要“好看”也要“好用”[J]. 人民论坛, 2017(29): 132-133.
	[ Cheng Huizhe. From the public cultural space to the National Cultural Park, the public cultural space should be both “beautiful” and “easy to use”[J]. People’s Tribune, 2017(29): 132-133.]
[49]	侯兵, 金阳, 胡美娟. 文旅融合发展视域下大运河文化建设的地方响应研究: 以中国大运河江浙段沿线城市为例[J]. 中国名城, 2021, 35(9): 50-59.
	[ Hou Bing, Jin Yang, Hu Meijuan. Research on the local response of the cultural construction of the Grand Canal from the perspective of cultural and tourism integration: Taking the cities along the Jiangsu-Zhejiang section of the Grand Canal as an example[J]. China Ancient City, 2021, 35(9): 50-59.]

类型	代表性项目	数量	所占比例（%）
博物馆项目	中国京杭大运河博物建设项目、浙东运河博物馆项目、中国运河文化博物馆项目等	7	12.07
遗址公园项目	金门闸遗址公园项目、北厂漕仓遗址公园项目、春秋淹城遗址公园项目等	23	39.66
古镇或历史街区项目	杨柳青大运河国家文化公园项目、邵伯历史文化名镇保护项目、皂河龙运城保护项目等	15	25.86
文化旅游带及文化旅游廊道复合项目	大运河嘉兴段文化旅游复合廊道建设项目、德城大运河文化旅游复合廊道建设项目、天津市大运河文化旅游复合廊道建设项目等	6	10.34
运河非物质文化遗产馆项目	大运河非物质文化遗产传习中心、天津市非物质文化遗产馆、运河民俗文化公园等	7	12.07

结果类型	交互作用
q（X₁∩X₂）>q（X₁）+q（X₂）	非线性增强
q（X₁∩X₂）=q（X₁）+q（X₂）	独立
q（X₁∩X₂）>max[q（X₁）, q（X₂）]	双因子增强
min[q（X₁）, q（X₂）]<q（X₁∩X₂）<max[q（X₁）, q（X₂）]	单因子非线性减弱
q（X₁∩X₂）<min[q（X₁）, q（X₂）]	非线性减弱

维度	指标	数据
自然环境因素	运河水系	运河水系邻近度
文化遗产因素	遗产基础	运河文化遗产邻近度
社会环境因素	交通基础	交通道路邻近度
社会环境因素	人口基础	常住人口规模
经济产业因素	财政基础	财政收入水平
经济产业因素	第三产业基础	第三产业比重
政治环境因素	政策基础	政策支持力度

与最邻近运河垂直距离（m）	占比（%）
<1 000	22.97
1 000~5 000	36.49
5 000~10 000	24.32
>10 000	16.22

缓冲区范围（m）	运河文化遗产数量（个）	占比（%）
1 000	0~3	21.62
	4~6	60.81
	7~9	17.57
10 000	0~4	24.32
	5~9	64.86
	10~15	10.82
30 000	0~5	31.08
	6~15	67.57
	15~20	1.35

Spatial distribution characteristics of the Grand Canal National Cultural Park project and its influencing factors

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 14

References 49

Related Articles 6

Metrics

Comments

维度	指标	探测因子	q值
自然环境因素	运河水系	运河水系邻近度（X₁）	-0.21
文化遗产因素	遗产基础	运河文化遗产邻近度（X₂）	-0.62
社会环境因素	交通基础	交通道路邻近度（X₃）	-0.11
社会环境因素	人口基础	常住人口规模（X₄）	0.04
经济产业因素	财政基础	财政收入水平（X₅）	0.09
经济产业因素	第三产业基础	第三产业比重（X₆）	0.35
政治环境因素	政策基础	政策支持力度（X₇）	0.12

A∩B	结果	解释	A∩B	结果	解释
X₁ ∩ X₂	0.77	双因子增强型	X₃ ∩ X₄	0.34	非线性增强型
X₁ ∩ X₃	0.42	非线性增强型	X₃ ∩ X₅	0.33	非线性增强型
X₁ ∩ X₄	0.48	非线性增强型	X₃ ∩ X₆	0.54	非线性增强型
X₁ ∩ X₅	0.43	非线性增强型	X₃ ∩ X₇	0.29	非线性增强型
X₁ ∩ X₆	0.67	非线性增强型	X₄ ∩ X₅	0.20	非线性增强型
X₁ ∩ X₇	0.42	非线性增强型	X₄ ∩ X₆	0.50	非线性增强型
X₂ ∩ X₃	0.81	非线性增强型	X₄ ∩ X₇	0.28	非线性增强型
X₂ ∩ X₄	0.72	非线性增强型	X₅ ∩ X₆	0.65	非线性增强型
X₂ ∩ X₅	0.70	双因子增强型	X₅ ∩ X₇	0.27	非线性增强型
X₂ ∩ X₆	0.92	双因子增强型	X₆ ∩ X₇	0.55	非线性增强型
X₂ ∩ X₇	0.72	双因子增强型

[1]	Zou Tongqian, Qiu Ziyi, Miao Hui. The reform of cultural heritage protection system under the background of the National Cultural Park construction [J]. ECOTOURISM, 2023, 13(3): 394-407.
[2]	Ma Mengyao, Tang Jianxiong. Spatial distribution of China’s industrial heritage and selection of sustainable tourism development model [J]. ECOTOURISM, 2023, 13(2): 279-292.
[3]	Zhu Jianhua, Gong Yue, Dong Jie, Li Wenya. Spatial distribution, classification and governance mode of cross-boundary scenic spots [J]. ECOTOURISM, 2022, 12(6): 1053-1066.
[4]	Gao Caixia, Liu Jiaming, Li Fengjiao, Zhu He, Liu Min. The spatial distribution of China’s national tourism resorts and itsinfluencing factors [J]. ECOTOURISM, 2022, 12(3): 386-398.
[5]	ZHENG Qunming, TIAN Tian, Yang Xiaoya. The spatial distribution and influencing factors of the national forest villages in China [J]. ECOTOURISM, 2021, 11(3): 441-454.
[6]	SHEN Shikun, SHI Chunyun, ZHANG Dayuan, ZHANG Yanyu, JIANG Qiao. Research on the spatial distribution of rural tourist attractions in Jiangsu Province and its influencing factors [J]. ECOTOURISM, 2021, 11(3): 455-467.

与最邻近运河文化遗产点的直线距离（m）	占比（%）
<500	50.00
500~1 000	18.92
1 000~2 000	31.08

与最近公路垂直距离（m）	占比（%）
<1 000	75.68
1 000~2 000	13.51
2 000~3 000	6.76
>3 000	4.05